Under Windows XP (rightly or wrongly) we always installed our programs into folders under 'Program Files' and accepted that they'd be kind-of available to everyone. Some examples: Google Chrome is installed into AppData. We now install to C:Programs and will not change back. up vote 4 down vote favorite When UAC was first introduced, most well-behaving applications were installed into Program Files folder, so any tampering with executable files without explicit user consent became http://computersecurityadvice.com/why-does/why-does-uninstall-8594-allow-program-to-update-software.html
If you install to program files, any user on the operating system can run the program. Always felt 'wrong' to me. Of course you should copy all folders already in there to the new partition before you do so :-) Comments are closed. TeX \newcommand and D.R.Y. (don't repeat yourself) When choosing a numeric PIN, does it help or hurt to make each digit unique?
DWalker says: March 9, 2012 at 11:29 am The recommendation (and the trend) to install programs into %UserProfile%Apps is a security issue. To protect yourself and your users you need a restrictive system configuration, without administrative rights for users (no UAC doesn't work for that purpose), plus SAFER a.k.a. It will launch your batch file with the 32 bit version of the shell and so everything should work fine. Should I refactor the code that is marked as "don't change"?
Joshua says: March 12, 2012 at 9:00 am @Stefan Kanthak: Congratulations. So it's nice that they did that, IMO. Stefan Kanthak says: March 9, 2012 at 5:08 am @ender | 32bit programs can access C:Program Files just fine. 32bit programs^Wbatch files can't use neither "%ProgramFiles%" nor "%ProgramFiles(x86)%" to access that Program Files X86 Specifically, the above-linked blog post states: Some of Microsoft's software certification programs (such as the Windows Logo) require that applications set their default installation location to the Program Files directory. /.../
Why C:Program Files has to be for native 64-bit and 32-bit programs going to C:Program Files (x86)?. Install Python There is no reason why Windows does not have system/global program files and per-user program files. Mind you, I am talking about %LocalAppData%\Programs which was designed specifically for installing program files. no "next next next" or preferred installation folder or anything :-(Kindest regards, Martin Saturday, July 27, 2013 7:29 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Hi Martin Have you
Operator that combines sum, product and difference between two numbers Help with code for this table? Reply Sanjayhk7 5 years ago thanks a lot. Why Does Python Install In Appdata But to make one thing clear, 32 bit compatability means that applications will run without modification while they stick to the 32 bit world, and that means staying in WoW64 processes. Appdata Folder Windows Installer knows about these on Windows 7 too, which finally fixed one of the biggest problems with trying to author per-user installs in previous versions of Windows.
siunitx display uncertainty of zero Which day of the week again? I do it mostly in case that partition fills up, you can copy the contents of that partition to another a lot easier than copying the boot partition. (Or at least Useful Searches Recent Posts Menu Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums Recent Posts Members Members Quick Links Notable Members Current Visitors Recent Activity New Profile Posts News Tutorials Tutorials Quick Links How can I build a Nuclear Reactor in my backyard? App Data
If you want UAC to be effective, then nobody can log in regularly to their workstations as administrators (even local administrators) as it breaks the model. Taken one way it would seem to be something like AppData\Local\MyApp, and another way it would seem to be just as valid under the user's My Documents\MyApp equivalent. The two directory names should be consistent with each other (and with earlier versions), that is, should be "Python35" in all cases. Some installed into the root of your C: drive.
We shouldn't really be installing any packages into the Roaming profile at all, but as this is a highly underused feature it's not a big deal. (And since we add platform Ds4windows voo says: March 8, 2012 at 2:54 pm @jader3rd Hmm personally I see only two variants at the moment: Give my users (well, people whom I fix their PCs, say parents, John says: March 8, 2012 at 4:11 am @640k Visual Studio 6.0 (or maybe some of it's SPs) installs, and registers, com dlls in the TEMP directory if it cannot write
Because of this, there is no drive-letter independent way to always xcopy deploy or define paths to the 32-bit Program Files. %ProgramFiles% and %SystemDrive%Program Files differs depending on whether it's 32-bit Only the installation lasted for ever, as compared to the "normal" Chrome install. share|improve this answer edited Feb 27 at 8:01 answered Aug 22 '14 at 13:36 Michael Kjörling 2,7311640 1 OTOS if I buy software and it is written by people not Master Programmer says: March 8, 2012 at 1:56 pm @voo The solution isn't to make the binaries writable by everyone but to have a background service that can update the executables.
I haven't been able to find any ini file or anything.. The biggest downside is that the user needs administrative privileges, which isn't always required by the program.Click to expand... Later I found out how they avoided this problem for remote field installs: by simply not patching Firefox at all. I found the MSDN docs confusing. :-) windows-7 windows-xp installation migration share asked Dec 2 '09 at 9:46 robsoft 4,26022546 1 Hah, I know what you mean.
How does the movie Spirited Away justify its title? Has anyone got a clear guide for where all this stuff goes? The directory that serves as a common repository for application-specific data for the current roaming user. needless to say..